The RBA cuts interest rates again. How low will they go?

Thu, 04 Jul 2019  |  

This article first appeared on The Guardian website at this link: 


The RBA cuts interest rates again. How low will they go?

 It’s better late than never.

The Reserve Bank of Australia has cut interest rates for the 14th time in this elongated monetary policy easing cycle that began way back in November 2011.

The official cash rate is at a fresh record low of 1.0%, and there is a better than even chance rates will go even lower in the months ahead. The economy is negotiating an increasingly entrenched period of moribund growth. This is seeing interlinked problems of chronically low inflation and subdued wages growth, both of which are unlikely to materially improve until the annual rate of GDP growth picks up to at least 3% for a couple of years.

The latest annual GDP growth rate is just 1.8%, which is a long way from where it needs to be.

With the latest interest rate cut, the RBA governor, Philip Lowe, mentioned a few positive points for the economy, which suggests it will likely pause for a few months before seriously considering further interest rate moves.
In particular, Lowe noted “the outlook for the global economy remains reasonable”, which is shorthand for a broadly neutral influence from overseas to Australia in the near term. This looks a fair assessment. Lowe also pointed out that infrastructure spending is increasing and that investment in the resources sector is picking up in line with strength in exports. Again, these positive factors are evident in the recent national accounts.

The concern, according to Lowe, remains weak household consumption and softness in housing markets, even though, as he noted, there are “tentative signs that [house] prices are now stabilising”. Perhaps most importantly, at least for considerations of monetary policy, Lowe noted “subdued” inflation pressures, a recent rise in the unemployment rate and the need to make “further inroads into spare capacity in the economy”.

This is the crux of what the current stance of monetary policy is trying to address. These economic circumstances were broadly in place about a year ago, when the RBA should have cut interest rates to current levels, a move which would have supported activity in 2019.

It is well documented that in 2018 the RBA was starry-eyed about the economic outlook as well as using monetary policy to act as a brake on house prices and household debt. It also was of the view that steady interest rates were a sign of financial stability, even as economic conditions faltered.

These errors and misjudgments have cost tens of thousands of jobs, with the unemployment rate rising, underlying inflation hitting record lows and annual wages growth stalling at a little above 2%.

The RBA is now playing catch up.

Whether the RBA has done enough with a 1.0% cash rate to kickstart the economy to the point where wages growth and inflation pick up to more comfortable levels is not yet clear. A lot will depend on factors outside its control including tax policy and other possible pro-growth measures from the Morrison government, what happens in the global economy and, in particular, whether the recent strength in commodity prices and the terms of trade can be sustained.

Also important will be the housing cycle for both prices and new construction. As Lowe noted, there are indeed tentative signs that house prices are close to stabilising after nearly two years of decline. Very favourable affordability suggests price growth is likely over the next few years, aided by the current level of interest rates. If this turns out to be the case, consumer spending will no longer be constrained by the weight of falling wealth. Auction clearance rates in Sydney and Melbourne are back at levels consistent with moderate house price gains.

New dwelling construction remains a problem with building approvals still in sharp decline. This will see dwelling investment undermine economic growth through to the middle of 2020, but with strong population growth and the absence of any oversupply of dwellings, there is a limit, which is near, to how far dwelling construction can fall.

Lowe is correct when he says that the economy is registering solid export growth, the terms of trade are buoyant, the business investment outlook is improving and government infrastructure and other spending are strong. All of which presents some support for the economy over the remainder of 2019 into 2020.

For now the interest rate futures market is pricing in a further 25 basis point interest rate cut by the end of 2019, a move that would take official interest rates to 0.75%. Whether this is delivered by the RBA will critically depend on the impact of the stimulus from the two most recent interest rate cuts, the soon to be legislated cuts in income taxes and the impact of global conditions on domestic activity.



comments powered by Disqus


“Bitterly disappointing”: We are seeing a once in a generation policy failure

Thu, 12 Sep 2019

This article first appeared on the Yahoo Finance website at this link: 


“Bitterly disappointing”: We are seeing a once in a generation policy failure

Imagine having the power to promote economic growth, lower the unemployment rate and set in train the conditions to boost real wages growth and inflation?

It would be immensely satisfying to change policies to improve the living standards and quality of life for every day, hard-working Australians and their families.

Wouldn’t it?

Next imagine a harsh reality where economic growth is weak and slowing, the unemployment rate is rising and wages growth and inflation well below a satisfactory level, and you choose not to wield the power reverse these uncomfortable circumstances?

Doing nothing, unwilling to pump some much needed cash into the economy because of a political dogma wedded to a notion that budget surpluses are good and that holding interest rates unnecessarily high so you might dampen demand for houses – which is seen as a problem - and household debt overwhelms your power to make things better.

The RBA admits it stuffed things up – sort of

Mon, 22 Jul 2019

This article first appeared on the Yahoo website at this link:


The RBA admits it stuffed things up – sort of

The Reserve Bank of Australia needs to be congratulated for publishing research which implicitly confirms that it made a mistake when setting monetary policy in the period mid-2017 to early 2019.

Not that the research explicitly says that, but the RBA Discussion Paper, Cost-benefit Analysis of Leaning Against the Wind, written by Trent Saunders and Peter Tulip, makes the powerful conclusion that by keeping monetary policy tighter in order to “lean against” the risk of a financial crisis, there was a cost to the economy that is three to eight times larger than the benefit of minimising the risk of such a crisis eventuating.

The costs to the economy includes lower GDP growth and higher unemployment, that lasts for at least for several years.

A few terms first.

According to the Saunders/Tulip research, “leaning against the wind”, a term widely used in central banking, is “the policy of setting interest rates higher than a narrow interpretation of a central bank’s macroeconomic objectives would warrant due to concerns about financial instability”. In the RBA’s case, the “narrow interpretation” of the RBA’s objectives are the 2 to 3 per cent inflation target and full employment.

In the context of the period since 2017 and despite the RBA consistently undershooting its inflation target and with labour underutilisation significantly above the level consistent with full employment, the RBA steadfastly refused to ease monetary policy (cut official interest rates) because it considered higher interest rate settings were appropriate to “lean against” house price growth and elevated levels of household debt.